Follow us on Facebook

One on One Support

Health Concerns
VA Issues  


Information:
Notice: Website under construction,
Contact
HCVets@gmail.com  
 

May 2014 VA Hep C Treatment Guidelines
UPDATE: Feb 26, 2016-
Funding and Prioritization Status Update

UPDATE: March 2016
VA Hep C Treatment Guidelines
VA to treat all vets in system
 

By Judith Graham
VA Extends New Hepatitis C Drugs to All Veterans in Its Health System

 
Orange Count Registry
Vietnam vets blame 'jet guns' for their hepatitis C
By Lily Leung Feb. 14, 2016 
 
CBS News Investigates
Congress outraged over hepatitis C treatment VA can't afford
Dr. Raymond Schinazi played a leading role developing a drug that cures hepatitis C while working seven-eighths of his time for the VA
 
ibtimes.com| By amynordrum
 


Hepatitis C drug costing VA, DoD millions
By Patricia Kime, Staff writer
We're looking at a company who is milking a cash cow for everything it's worth," Sanders said. 
 


VA to outsource care for 180,000 vets with hepatitis C
Dennis Wagner, The Arizona Republic 12:27 a.m. EDT June 21, 2015
 


VA to outsource care for 180,000 vets with hepatitis C
, The Republic | azcentral.com 11:51 a.m. MST June 19, 2015
Dr. David Ross, the VA's director public-health pathogens programs, resigned from the working group. "I cannot in good conscience continue to work on a plan for rationing care to veterans," he wrote.
 


VA Region Stops Referring Patients To Outside Hospitals Thanks To Budget Shortfall
Michael Volpe Contributor ...According to a memo — the entire region has been forced to stop all “non-VA care” referrals due to a budget shortfall.
 

DisabledVeterans.org
OIG INVESTIGATES VA CHOICE PROGRAM PROBLEMS
Sen. Mark Kirk admitted the VA Choice Program is a failed joke in a letter to Secretary Bob McDonald despite attempts to fix it.
 

 
Denied Hep C VA dental care?
Please click here

 
Dried Hepatitis C Blood Exposure 11/23/2013 Weeks later inconspicuous blood transmits virus and more likely to cause accidental exposures to Hep C
 

Lack of Standards for
Mass Vaccinations
1970 Jetgun Nursing Instructions
 

2014 AASLD Study Hepatitis C not an STD

Home
Test the Rest Campaign
Documentation & Surveillance Alerts
Military Hepatitis History  
Understanding The Liver 
VA Flow Sheet for Cirrhosis
VA Defines Risk Factors
 
Hep C & Pro-Prebiotic
Need to know-Grassroots Research
 
Blog Another12Weeks
One Vets' Journey Though Treatment
 

 Ask NOD
 What Would Veterans Do?
Blog for VA Claims
 


Help with VA Claims
 


 
Info: Plan Backfires-
VBA Fast Letter Boost Claims
 
Legal- Fed Regs state:
Judge decision may be relied upon
Cotant v. Principi, 17 Vet.App. 116, 134 (2003),
 
Service Connected Claims
# 1 Conclusion of Law 
# 2 Conclusion of Law 
 
More Claims
Jetgun Decisions
Hep C Decisions
 
Search Board of Appeals Website
BVA Jetgun Decisions
BVA Hepatitis C Decisions

Great Advice!  
After the jetgun win
What to do next

 

 


How infectious are dead bodies?

Wednesday, January 05, 2005

Transmission of infection requires the presence of an infectious agent, exposure to that agent, and a susceptible host. It is, therefore, possible to characterise the infectious risk from dead bodies following a natural disaster by considering these elements.

The human body is host to many organisms, only some of which are pathogenic. When the body dies, the environment in which pathogens live can no longer sustain them. However, this does not happen immediately, and transmission of infectious agents from a cadaver to a living person may occur.

Infectious hazards for individuals who routinely handle cadavers include tuberculosis, group A streptococcal infection, gastroenteritis, transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (such as Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease), hepatitis B, hepatitis C, HIV infection, and possibly meningitis and septicemia (especially meningococcal). Micro-organisms involved in the decay process (putrefaction) are not pathogenic.

Do victims of natural disasters have these infections when they die? Usually disaster victims die from trauma, burns, or drowning, and they are no more likely than the local population to have acute infections (meningitis and septicemia) or rare diseases (eg Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease).

Instead, where disease is present, it is far more likely to be due to chronic infections with blood-borne viruses (hepatitis B virus, hepatitis C virus, and HIV), enteric pathogens, and possibly Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Historically, epidemics resulting in mass casualties have only occurred from a few diseases, including plague, cholera, typhoid, tuberculosis, anthrax, and smallpox. As previously noted, such infections are no more likely to be present in disaster victims than in the general population.

Furthermore, although some of these diseases are highly contagious, their causative agents are unable to survive long in the human body following death. It is, therefore, unlikely that such epidemics will result from contact with a cadaver.

Indeed, survivors present a much more important reservoir for disease. Where dead bodies have contaminated water supplies, gastroenteritis has been the most notable problem, although communities will rarely use a water supply where they know it to be contaminated by dead bodies.

Source: PAHO
http://www.jamaicaobserver.com/news/html/20050104T190000-0500_72605_OBS_HOW_INFECTIOUS_ARE_DEAD_BODIES_.asp 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Thursday Edition: Do Dead Bodies Really Create Disease Risk?
By Al Tompkins (more by author)

As I read and watched the tsunami coverage, I wanted to know more about the risk of disease that thousands of unburied bodies might create. I have read press accounts of natural disasters stretching back several years now, and many report about the need to bury the dead because of a risk of spreading disease. But even the World Health Organization says that is not true. In a December 27 update, WHO said: "Dead bodies do not pose any health threat, but they feed fears and can divert precious attention and resources from effective relief efforts."

The WHO statement is one of a growing number of reports that say that bodies of people killed by trauma pose no overwhelming health risk unless the dead were infected with disease before they died. Here is a 1999 Slate story on the topic, after a devastating earthquake in Turkey.

The New York Times' coverage Wednesday included a passage that indicated there should be no rush to bury.

Even as local health officials out in the field were racing to create mass graves or pyres to deal with the rising tide of bodies, saying the bodies posed immediate health risks, officials of the World Health Organization emphasized that the biggest risk of an outbreak was posed by survivors.

The agency's officials said Tuesday that because there was little danger of epidemics from unburied bodies, immediate mass burials and cremations were not necessary. Instead, they said, family members and friends should be given time, where possible, to identify the bodies first.

I have seen similar articles elsewhere. This is from News-Medical.net

"There is no evidence that, following a natural disaster, dead bodies pose a risk of epidemics," says Oliver Morgan, at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, who is author of the article and who has worked with the disaster-assistance groups Oxfam and Médecins Sans Frontières (Doctors Without Borders) in Latin America, India, Africa, and the Balkans.

Historically, epidemics resulting in mass casualties have only occurred from a few diseases, including plague, cholera, typhoid, tuberculosis, anthrax, and smallpox. However, such infections are no more likely to be present in disaster victims than in the general population. In addition, while some of these diseases are highly infectious, they are unable to survive for long in the human body after death occurs. It is therefore unlikely that such epidemics will result from contact with a cadaver. Instead, notes the article, "it is far more likely that survivors will be a source of disease outbreaks."

That article said:

While the risks for rescue workers who handle dead bodies are higher than for the survivors of a disaster, they can be limited through a set of simple measures. Appropriate precautions include training military personnel and others who might have to provide assistance after a disaster, vaccinating those persons against hepatitis B and tuberculosis, using body bags and disposable gloves, washing hands after handling cadavers, and disinfecting stretchers and vehicles that have been used to transport bodies.

Wired.com published a story about what American disaster officials learned about body disposal after the September 11, 2001 attacks.

The Real Risks

Make no mistake about it. The health problems in the tsunami areas are overwhelming. Experts are now warning that as many people could die of diseases as from the actual tsunami. The World Health Organization says these are currently the biggest problems:

South East Asia is endemic for malaria and dengue fever. Flooding and stagnant water create favorable conditions for the mosquito vector. Overcrowding facilitates mosquito bites and therefore transmission ...
Poor quality and quantity of water and insufficient sanitation, overcrowding, and poor hygiene in temporary camps will bring forward the risk for outbreaks of different diarrheal diseases. Thorough and sustained water purification is an absolute priority ...
Apart from biological pollution, the possibility that the environment may be polluted by leaks or overflows from flooded chemical factories and warehouses must also be taken into consideration. Water can be contaminated by gasoline and oil leaking from damaged vehicles